Daffersd

BNP - BBC reporting

2007-01-12T21:13:00.000+01:00

"So what did he think of her relationship with Mr Sen-Chang?

"I'm not opposed to mixed marriages but children [of these relationships] are washing out the identity of this country's indigenous people. That's my view. It's not the party's view."

Mr Barnbrook did not appear to be aware that Ms Clarke and Mr Sen-Chang have a child."

This was one of the reasons I had a problem with the BNP, I hope he was misquoted, if not he is a prize tosser, however Ms Clarke and Mr Chang have my support and the more I hear about herthe more grateful that I am that people such as Simone Clarke are in the BNP, Ms Clarke, you have the same view as the large silent fuming minority, we support you.

Is Bush right to send more troops to Iraq? Do not Have your say - BBC and stupidity

2007-01-11T16:57:00.000+01:00

Well in spite of myself I posted and of course it was not put up. This time the moonbats have taken over en masse and I have not seen a single intelligent comment.

When I look at the Brits who post on the BBC I just hope that they are the ones blown up when the next Islamic bloodfeast comes to the UK. I know, they will blame the USA for that, you end up sitting there shaking your head in bewilderment at these people, I have almost come to the conclusion that these shitbags deserve what Islam is going to bring them.

I almost commented on Harrys Place over a comment from Gene who said this:

"although I can never forgive Bush and company for making that so much more difficult to achieve than it should have been."

Well if we think back on this, I seem to remember that Bush and his government were advised by people like Karen Armstrong who happens to believe that Islam and modernity go together, OK there was also the belief that Iraq was the most secular ME country and that the effect that Saddams brutality had on people was not understood.

But of course I don't hold people to impossible levels of success, mistakes happen, success comes from keeping at it, staying focussed and adjust to make it work, and there are reasons for mistakes, the Bush government thought that the Iraqi people would be able to take hold of the freedom with both hands, but once you get to know Islam and the strength of fear used by Islam then you soon understand why it went pear shaped. But we are six years down the line from 9/11 and the majority of the people are ignorant about Islam and many of them are our leaders and our media. However isn't it interesting to see that once the Democrats won that the US media is a bit harder with the Islamics, funny that?

What now, well I think there are some seriously smart people in the USA running this war, the Somalia war was a master class, many Western Jihadists were killed, people who would have come back to the West and caused mayhem. We did not get the three main targets, we will, success will come if we keep at it.

I have two major concerns:

1. Muslims taking over through demographics and a lack of management of this issue
2. Muslims having Nukes, especially fundamentalists, after all they love death

There are a number of people who suggest that we are in the last death throes of Islam and there are signs that Islam is under pressure, perhaps this is true, but Islam in its death throes is causing so much death, misery and destruction, in its death throes it will bring the joys of Islam to every corner of the Earth, death basically.

If you take a good long look at the concept of the death throes of Islam then you can understand the strategy of Bush and Blair and the Europeans, which is to show the Muslim masses that there is a better way. To fight a limited war, to minimize casualties, and to keep saying, we are not the enemy of Islam, well we are. Because by being free, open and having our own laws we are the enemies of Islam. But we are not the enemies of people who reject the violence inherent in Islam, though they are not Muslims, but even then they are heavily impacted by their Muslim conditioning which overwhelms them with fear, arrogance and ignorance, and yet they do not know that this has been done to them. Do I feel sorry for Muslims, yes, do I want them near me, no, because I enjoy life not death.

Now back to the gist of this, is Bush doing the right thing in Iraq, the answer to that is, it depends what he is really doing, I think Iran is going to come to a head soon and that is the depend bit.

The squeeze is on Iran, the USA just blocked an important Iranian bank, they have started taking action against the Iranians and Iranian supported thugs causing so much mayhem in Iraq. Another interesting thing is that there does seem to be some political pressure on the current Iranian President, and people make mistakes, though it could be play acting just as the USA seems to be building up to the threat. The Iranians have been playing this game with so called moderates in the past.

If Bush has done that to put the squeeze on Iran then yes, if not, then no, the only way we can win this is by putting pressure on Syria and Iran, they have got away with absolute murder for so long. But why have they waited for so long, well I think I understand, the Sunni states such as Saudia Arabia are almost begging the USA to go for Iran.

So what will happen to Iran if their Islamothugs are no longer in power, well Iran could well become what Iraq should have been, as there are a lot of people who want freedom and are sick of Islam, they want out.

The stakes are very very high indeed at this point in time, perhaps we are now at that point in the war where we either win with a lowish level of casualties or it turns into a worldwide Islam bloodfeast.

Have your say - BBC

2007-01-09T22:01:00.000+01:00

Well it looks like the BBC weenies have worked out some method to cut the number of Pro-USA posts and increase the amount of recommendations for anti-USA posts on their (not) Have your Say (if your sensible)...

Lets looks at the fist one, most recommended:

So the Americans bombed a village?
Because there may be suspected terrorists there?
Funny, thats what Saddam did wasnt it.
Does the US EVER get on the ground? Isnt it a lot easier to positivly identify people that way? You want to get rid of 'suspect terrorists' then YOU take the risks...not just bomb entire villages.
The world wants to see your evidence Mr Bush and this time it had better be good.

Philip Jones, Frangy, France

When I read such a post I have to wonder at the intelligence of the person who wrote it and of course the people who recommended it. Does he understand what Special Forces are for, they spot for aircraft, do they know about laser guidance, do they know the level of sophistication of the targeting systems in this Spectre gunship, did they even check to see that the UIC had been chased there. All you can do is just laugh at the breathless stupidity of this.

America bombs another muslim country, killing civilians, and people on forums applaud. I wonder if the victims were not black and muslim, would there be more outrage? Next time America is bombed by muslims, I will remember Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine and now Somalia.

Geraint, London, UK

I have one thing to say to Geraint DARFUR!!!

Seems to me that our European "friends" are scared to death. Scared of the Muslims that are lurking in all their capital cities. When the US defends itself, these Muslims get agitated.And they already know they have you. We choose to fight.

James A Pacella, Chicago

Whereas we choose to think and try to sort the problem. Therein lies the difference. If war is so effective why is Al Qaeda still alive and growing?

[VicolaW], Bury, United Kingdom

The reason Al Qaeda is growing is because we are not doing enough of this Somalia type action, my American friend is spot on and this Brit is another sorry excuse for a Brit.

By killing innocent people and attacking soveignity of another independent country, US, once again, has shown that she is above and beyond any rule of law

Ali Farzad, Boston, US

I did not think Al Qaeda was innocent my dear Terrorist supporting waste of space, ahh but devout Muslims are innocent aren't they, I hope the FBI has his number, or maybe he is one of those drivers in St Paul not accepting blind people as they have a dog?

How would everyone feel if the USA sent missiles to 'suspected cells' in High Wycombe because some of the 7/7 suspects were from there?

Kashif Ahmed, Reading, United Kingdom

As a Brit I will give you the answer I would totally and utterly support it.

So now the US country can go and bomb where and when they like without any credible evidence, due process and legal authority.

Isnt that called Terrorism?

Arshad, Preston

Is that the same due process, legal authority and credible evidence used by Al Qaeda that the people it blows up across the globe are not innocent. What was your point exactly, just another Islamic is the victim type point of the USA.

It is very noticeable that the Anti-USA and anti-West lefties and Islamics have with the support of BBC staffers taken over comments again.

US heavily involved in Somalia

2007-01-09T15:17:00.000+01:00

http://www.counterterrorismblog.org/
http://www.pajamasmedia.com/2007/01/americas_boots_on_the_ground_i.php

The US was heavily involved in this attack on the UIC, brilliant campaign, what is more by having Ethiopian ground forces they can leave the Ethiopians to look after the prisoners and as they are a third world country and if I am not mistaken a left wing one, the left wing moonbats are not able to throw their atrocity shit around with wild abandon.

This is exactly how it should be done, with luck a large number of expensively trained Western Muslim Jihadists are feeding maggots at this point in time, and will not be setting of bombs in subways and the like. A big thank you to the people of Ethiopia and the US.

And while I am at it, please read this post, spot on:

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/rewriting-the-rules-of-war/

UPDATE: The EU have commented on and is mortified by the US involvement:

"The attacks were condemned by the EU today. “Any incident of this kind is not helpful in the long term,” Amadeu Altafaj Tardio, a European commission spokesman, said. "

OK, so lets think about this:

The UIC was threatening to attack Ethiopia and destroy the transitional government, the Al Qaeda training facilities in Somalia have been destroyed, a pro-Al Qeada government has been destroyed, many Western Al Qaeda trained terrorists have been killed, their training all gone to waste, now they will not be setting off bombs in Western cities. Of course it was not helpful, what dorkish planet does this twat come from, ahhhh hold on he is Spanish, must be a Zaperato clone.

Perhaps the EU is playing the soft cop to the hard cop US, if so they are extremely good at it, if not then these people are worse then the terrorists?

The British National Party

2007-01-08T17:16:00.000+01:00

I recently had a discussion with a BNP supporter on Up Pompeii, like many people I grew up with the concept of Nation Front skinheads being a bunch of nasty steel toed clad racists. Like many people I have had my share of PC grooming, even in 1999 after 2 years of finding out more about Islam I was still clinging to to the Islam is a religion of peace mantra for security, even though my belief in that was in tatters.

On Jihad Watch I once said that if you give me a choice between Fascism and Islam then I would chose the Fascists as there is no way back from Islam.

About 6 to 8 months ago I went on the BNP site and found something mildly racist, today I went back having had this discussion on racism, I read Nick Griffins pieces and straight away I connected with what he is saying. Perhaps in Nick Griffin we have that Winston Churchill figure?

I would offer one important bit of advice, in France the FN seems to be making a grave error linking in with some of the Muslims with anti-Jewish attitudes, I would strongly advise Mr Griffin and co to start speaking to Philip de Villiers and stop any contact with Le Pen, de Villiers seems much more in touch with the BNP as they are now, which is praise indeed.

The BNP is a legitimate political party and at this point they will get my vote in the next general election, because they are the only party to tell the truth about Islam, in fact I would even join the BNP at this point.

France, what can one say...

2007-01-08T11:41:00.000+01:00

As I have stated I live in France, yesterday we had a family get together and I had my wife’s brother and oldest sister over with their respective other half’s.

The first question is when is a tax not a tax, when it is made to look like insurance?

The discussion went like this, that the schemes such a retirement and sickness etc. are insurance and not a tax, I pointed out that I had no option but to participate, he replied that car insurance is obligatory, but I replied it was my choice whether to have a car or not and I was forced to buy cover against causing injury to others, not for myself.

The French system has numerous mutual funds that take a slice of ones money, and cover retirement, health and sickness etc., they are obligatory and you can not opt out and they are paying for the costs now, not building the fund for the future, but are guaranteed by the state, its almost as amusing as Americans talking about social security ruining the European economies while out of control health and pension costs are killing GM and Ford.

So in my opinion they are a tax, while my socialist brother in law thinks they are an insurance, because you only pay for them if you work and of course you are only covered if you have paid into them, the complexity of who qualifies and how much you get is typical French. My point of view is that they are an insurance paid from tax, this is re-inforced by the application of CSG & CRDS applied to all of your revenue, not just salary, which are taxes designed to reduce the deficit in these funds, fat chance that...

The second question, you say you’re a socialist and core to socialism is the even distribution of wealth so why does 25% of your income come from working on the black and you call yourself a socialist? The answer was and I have some sympathy for this is that big companies and rich people have the system tied up so us middle class pick up all the tax costs. But I have never fiddled my tax, so redistribute my wealth while he does, put your money where your mouth is baby.

So where did this get me, well we sort of agreed that a flat tax system on revenue was the way forward. We all agreed that there was no difference between the political parties in France, all were fleecing the middle class.

Sister in law suggested that Ms Royal would bring a womans touch and change things, I asked her how did she know this when she refused to answer direct questions, her policies seem to be window dressing and the only politician who answered any question with a degree of honesty was Sarkozy. Anyway, she can vote and I can’t…

Well then we got into a key aspect, called work, it was funny but all three family groups had decided to forget about producing more wealth, the reason was that all did was feed the beast and have a lower quality of life, we would work enough to pay our own costs and that was it. I then made the crushing point that this is exactly what the politicians wanted as they could dish out pork to the grateful low spending power masses. Gallic shrugs all-round…

Anyway started at 12:30 and ended at 19:45, my cave looks quite empty of wine now...

Stuck Mojo

2007-01-08T09:07:00.000+01:00

Great song and video, this is one that has been remixed by a fan obviously, but extremely powerful and I thought that the original song and video really made the point, especially the lyrics, lets rock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm-7SGCv78U&eurl=

Well knock me over with a well aimed Iranian Nuke, but...

2007-01-05T17:50:00.000+01:00

From the I love third world terrorists BBC some breaking news - "A British Muslim has been found guilty of soliciting murder during a London rally..."

If he was like me, he would get 5 years, as he is what he is, then 20 seconds of community service, what are the bets...

Update - Well even more amazing...

Remanding him in custody, Judge Brian Barker said he would not pass sentence until several other trials relating to the protest had concluded - expected to be in April.

The maximum penalty for soliciting murder is life in prison.

Perhaps..., we can start hoping, perhaps extremists will be deported, perhaps someone will stop Iran, perhaps someone will stop Saudi funding and literature arriving in Europe, perhaps my daughter has a future, perhaps I won't have to leave Europe, perhaps we ..., don't get carried away, Ethiopia crushed the UIC, perhaps Sadr will get knocked off, perhaps..., hold on, this is a start is it not?

Or will he be let out in April. I was wondering about this guys status, can he be deported and have his British citizenship removed from him, now that is the sort of action we should have when he leaves jail. But is New Labour up to it, I think we know the answer to that one...

Zawahiri

2007-01-05T16:43:00.000+01:00

I just looked at a still picture of him, see the mark on his forehead, this is from slamming his forehead on the floor while praying towards Mecca. By all accounts the slamming of the head on the floor is a mark of vanity, the more evident the mark the more pious. It just goes to show that fundamentalist Muslims are perhaps the vainest people on the planet. Vain arrogant and plain nasty, what a horrible excuse for a human being.

All thanks to the Jawa Report from where I nicked this fine picture who also added a few amusing comments about his whining over the UIC in Somalia , check this out at http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/

Life in the farmyard

2007-01-05T13:49:00.000+01:00

I was having one of those discussions with my daughter about history and the negative changes that have been occurring and how it will impact her life. And she came out with an analogy that was quite simple but very apt when I was explaining about the EU Elites. She said we were being farmed, and yes she is totally correct we are.

Our farmers have worked out that their breeding stock is not breeding enough and has the tendency to remove the farmer when conditions in the farm are not comfortable enough, so they bring in some new stock, they find out that this new stock is aggressive and intolerant to the existing stock but has certain behavioral patterns that in the long term will make them easier to control and will accept low levels of comfort and accept this with apathy as the perfect farmer said it was so so it must be so...

Well here we go, the out spoken troublesome animals are being removed through better cages and controls, the farmers will turn to the new faster breeding aggressive but cheaper stock. And me, well I think I will end up as some pate foie gras.

With thanks to my daughter who under Mohammed's perfect example would be expecting her second child by now...

So what did you do in the long war daddy

2007-01-05T12:07:00.000+01:00

Well I am a bit too old for that, I am likely to get the, "why did your generation screw up so much and leave my one to pay the price..." comment.

To which I will reply, "Actually it was the generation that was in the 20's and 30's during the 60's who did that, people of my age are sitting in impotent rage wondering how to stop the remorseless loss of our freedoms and wondering how we managed to get to this stage."

I was wondering how to start acting when the signs are there that our cozy world is about to collapse. I have suggested that as our governments have neglected their duty and our trust then we should now start to work on our own defense. We can network and we do not need a Mosque and a bain washing of stipid rules and hang ups to get ready for this. Though you have to admire the effectiveness of this population tool created by Mohammed and applied and refined by the people who came after him. Our enemies are very smart, many times smarter than our leaders and strategists, or so it seems or who is the enemy, I am beginning to feel like most Europeans that our Elites are out to get us.

I think we all agree that having fundamentalist Islam in our countries is criminal negligence of an extreme level, and to be blunt this bull shit about showing a religion respect should go straight out of the fucking window. EUROPEAN ELITES ARE YOU LISTENING, Europe is not religious, isn't that what you wanted? WHY ARE WE SHOWING RESPECT TO this third world killing cult? I see this across the West, the left and the Islamics are doing all they can to destroy Christianity and why is that?

Perhaps the Christian teachings do not make us like children enough for you, perhaps dumbing us down and turning us into Muslims will make it easier for the Elites to keep up that greasy little pole, so that the little people will no longer vote you all wise beings out of office and you can manipulate us with fear of hell, like the Islamic despots have been doing for years. That is it isn't it. Marxism and Islam have that in common, Islam is effectively a Marxist ideology with a bit of religion built in, while Marxism is basically Islam without the religious bits. Both are tools to control the masses and result in an elite keeping power from cradle to grave and use the little people as prawns.

Without a doubt New Labour is not really New Labour, it is old Labour with a very good figurehead who misled the masses. While in the European Union the Marxists are well and truely in the driving seat. This EUCM report is classic EU Marxism.

Now we have New Labour reducing the UK fleet, our air force and making the soldiers feel so badly treated that they are leaving in droves. Just as the real belligerent part of the long war is looming on the horizon, we are being made defenseless. Now what about the population at large, well we have no right to have any personnel defensive weapons, no second amendment for us, I suppose that when an Islamofascist turns up with his trusty AK47 I will engage him with my trusty toothpick.

When you read across the blogosphere you can find lots of detailed information about what is going on, are people aware that in every single Western country the exact same laws are being pushed by different Muslim groups to carry out the same stifling of speach, go and have a look at Conyers CAIR sponsored bill and compare it to the mess that the EUCM put out. Notice a trend anyone.

Well what did you do in the Long War daddy, the answer is simple I waited to die and lose my freedom...

Ethiopia and Somalia

2006-12-28T08:41:00.000+01:00

Ethiopia has handled the war in a masterful way, allowed the Islamic Courts to get into the open and then smashed them with heavy armour, helicopter gunships and fighter bombers, but in Mogadishu the Ethiopians will find this advantage will not exist and they will get bogged down and severely damaged in terrain that plays to the strength of the Islamics.

Ethiopia should not enter Mogadishu, they should leave that to the transitional government, leave Somalia at this point as they have indicated and leave the TGF to finish the job in Mogadishu.

At last a victory against the Islamic fascists.

Another BBC and EU classic

2006-12-22T13:16:00.000+01:00

Both the Islamist and interim government agreed to a ceasefire and to unconditional talks on Wednesday after a visit by EU envoy Louis Michel.

When the Islamists launched their attack as sensible people would expect, seeing as they felt strong enough to win, all the BBC could finish off their TV report with was that the fighting has dealt the EU peace mission a damaging blow, really..., what about, the EU application of soft power showed its ability once more to stop conflict and bring people to the table?

Perhaps we should send some unarmed police? LOL

Another day nearer another atrocity in the UK

2006-12-22T11:24:00.000+01:00

I live in France, but I do a contract which involves going to the City of London, using the tube too, which I did 2 weeks after 7/7, funny enough I went to the USA 2 weeks after 9/11, where I tried to explain to a wonderful sweet American lady why her daughter died and why they hate the USA.

In France I don't go to the Centre of the city where I live that often, the last time I went as a family I had a group of Muslim youths try to barge me to the side of the road which was laughable, but on the way back late at night we found ourselves in the middle of one of those Muslim youths vs Police incidents in a metro station, but with two young children in tow its not much fun, though I am reasonably capable of holding my own, my children and wife are not.

I remember that trip in London, I was on the tube, a bit nervous, on came this smartly dressed Muslim, with a shaven head and beard, in a suit and smart coat, but what got me was the ruck sack, old and tatty that was full to over-flowing with white plastic bags. I knew what he was doing, he was doing his bit to add to the terror, but with typical British fortitude I decided to ignore it.

However regarding this contract, I am going to end the contract, there are various reasons for this relating to the contract itself, but one of the reasons is that I do not want to go to the centre of London any more and expose myself to the risk. Perhaps the UK police and anti-terrorist units are doing a great job, but really they are like that dutch boy sticking his finger in the dike, they are policing a war. What more is there to add to that, there are a bunch of people at war with us, want to kill us and destroy our society and we are policing them. Does that make me feel any security, nope. That we allow this cult to freely move around and develop its power and we try to police it and apply our very fair laws to it(and very ineptly too), does it make me feel secure, nope.

Yesterday I posted about my views of Muslims as people and those non-Muslim Muslims that I feel for. As for a devout Muslim, a bullet in the back of the head is all I feel for them, do you understand that, they are my enemy and they are your enemy, even if many of you seek to deny that, but you can not reason with a religion that is so black and white.

Last night a Muslim guy looking after our heating wished my wife a happy Christmas, this guy is hard working and has his own company, I don't know if he wants Sharia, but he said and meant happy Christmas. I can not hate the people, I can only hate the cult.

This is what religion of pieces said and all I can say is that it really does get to the heart of it...

Twenty facts about Islam every infidel should know.

Islam ...

1) Is a mind-control and information-control cult founded by a murderer, torturer, brigand, rapist and pedophile called Mohammed. The mind-control and information-control aspects require that all criticism be silenced.

2) Is Mohammed's personality cult. Has no foundations other than Mo's murderous rantings (Koran and Hadith). The Koran consists of two conflicting parts - Meccan and Medinan (peaceful and violent respectively). The Medinan stuff supersedes ('abrogates') the Meccan stuff. Muslims act Medinan, but quote Meccan verses to the gullible infidels.

3) Claims to worship the same God as Christians and Jews, but in fact worships Allah - a demonic channelling through Mohammed's psychopathic ego. The Death Cult mixes garbled versions of Christian and Jewish scriptures with pagan practices such as moon and meteorite-worship, and cut-throat blood sacrifice of animals and non-believers.

4) Has no rational, philosophical nor theological basis, and the whole belief-system is contradicted by science, philosophy, commonsense, human decency and internal inconsistency.

5) Cannot withstand rational criticism. Can only spread and maintain itself by ignorance, illiteracy, war, terrorism, and intimidation. Islam has bloody borders and cannot co-exist peacefully with other belief systems. Winston Churchill said that Islam in a man is as dangerous as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog.

6) Has a superstitious dread of images of pigs, crosses, Buddhas, Saint George (and his flag) and of course Motoons.

7) Regards Islamic women as semihuman. Wife-beating, incest and child abuse (including mufa’khathat or 'thighing' - the ritual abuse of infants) are encouraged.

8) Regards all unbelievers (Kaffirs, Kuffar, Kufrs, Kafirs) as ritually unclean subhumans to be killed, subjugated, enslaved, exploited or parasitised. Kafirs are described by the Arabic word 'najis' - literally 'filth'. That's why Muslim hatred of Kafirs is intrinsic to their 'religion'. A Kafir doesn't need to DO anything to offend a Muslim, his very existence is enough of an affront.

9) The ethical system applies only to Muslims. Allah encourages rape, pillage, extortion and enslavement of non-Muslims. Morality does not extend beyond the global gang (ummah). Muslim ethics are the ethics of the Mafia.

10) Allah's followers are motivated by hatred, greed and lust. There is no love, mercy or compassion. Allah is vindictive, unpredictable, capricious and devious - "Allah leads astray whom he pleases".

11) The only religion NOT founded on The Golden Rule. Morality is based on Mohammed's example. If Mohammed did it then it's OK for all Muslims. Hence the encouragement of rape, pillage, subjugation and murder of non-believers and the institutionalised pedophilia prevalent throughout Muslim society (justified by Mohammed's activities with Ayesha, his child sex-slave - see and listen to http://islamcomicbook.com/lyrics1.htm).

12) All human relations are defined by Dominance/Subjugation. Muslims have schizoid inferiority/superiority complexes. (A well-balanced Muslim is one with a chip on each shoulder). They respect strength but despise compromise as weakness. Appeasement invites more aggression. The only political system which has been strong enough to subjugate Islam is Stalinism.

13) Polygamy ensures alpha-males get extra women, leading to a shortage of women for the betas. Beta-males must either jerk off (a sin leading to hell), or form dog-packs and rape or capture kafir women as booty in a razzia, or else self-destruct in the presence of infidels then they can screw 72 mythical virgins in Allah's bordello in the sky (see and listen to http://islamcomicbook.com/lyrics3.htm). Beta-males are often encouraged by their relatives to become suicide bombers because of the belief that such murderous 'martyrs' will be able to intercede with Allah to take 70 of their relatives to paradise with them.

14) Lying and deception of infidels (taqiyya) is encouraged. This may take many forms, including outright lies, feigned moderation, and condemnation of terrorist attacks to the Kaffir while rejoicing with fellow Muslims. All Muslims need to regard themselves as victims of some group of Kafirs so they can harbor grudges against them and against Kafirs in general. Individuals may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and must be considered potential killers who can flip in an instant (SJS -'Sudden Jihad Syndrome').

15) Muslims are forbidden to befriend Kaffirs except for purposes of deceit or where conversion may be possible.

16) The Koran is Allah's final word and cannot be changed or challenged. To do so is punishable by death. Consequently, the Death Cult can never change or be reformed. The instructions to murder and rape infidels are just as valid now as the day they were written. Since Islam cannot be modernised, the Muslims are attempting to Islamise modernity. This requires spreading Islam in the West and simultaneously preventing any criticism of the cult by intimidation and PC legislation to curtail freedom of expression.

17) Treaties and agreements with Kaffirs are made to be broken (Hudna). The word of a Muslim to a Kafir counts for nothing in the eyes of Allah. Allah is The Father Of Lies.

18) The world is divided between Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-Harb (the domain of war, the Kufr lands). Muslims living in Dar-al-Harb must work to disrupt their host nations until these can be brought into Dar-al-Islam.

19) Muslims have no obligation to their host nations and in fact are encouraged to parasitise them. Welfare fraud, identity theft, forgery etc are endemic in Western Muslim populations, and serious crime against Kaffirs is regarded as normal and justified. Extortion rackets against Kafirs are mandated by the Koran ('jizya' is the Arabic term for 'protection money' payable by Jews and Christians to Muslims).

20) The attack on the host nation isn't just against its religion and economy, but is aimed at its very cultural identity. Islam is a complete system, including a culture, which Muslims regard as superior (despite all evidence to the contrary) to other cultures. Muslims are therefore required to destroy the symbols of 'Jahiliya' (sometimes sp. Jahiliyya) - non-Muslim culture. In the East this has included destruction of Hindu temples and Christian churches and replacement with mosques, and destruction of Buddhist artwork and universities and replacement with heaps of rubble. This process of cultural replacement is now beginning in the West..

That is a very good overview for the layman, this is what we are dealing with, so if at the end a Muslim wants to bind himself to the above then expect no respect or mercy from me, you do not deserve it, you have lost your humanity to this death cult. But I really do feel for the non-Muslim Muslims who will yet again be the biggest victims of this sick cult.

Happy Christmas to you all and a safe new year

Good morning

2006-12-21T10:20:00.000+01:00

Well I am waiting for a bug ridden application to import some data, it has crashed 3 times and one of my colleagues just informed me that there is a problem with the server, ahhh it worked but 3 errors with the import, does it tell me which ones, nope, so export data to spreadsheet to compare against the one I just imported, isn't life wonderful. The stupid thing is that I could write the sub-routine.

I had written the post below last night, I suppose that it shows the difficulties that anyone who is Western and liberal has in dealing with Islam, I know what Islam is, but I really find it hard to work out how to approach it in regards to the non-Muslim Muslims...

Thinking about the post I made yesterday, I suppose my words could be used against me and the full weight of the EU could be applied to my humble being for daring to make such a point and suggestion. But note that I said this as a defensive measure when the Islamics make their move. I have never got away from my feeling that Muslims are the biggest victims of Islam and once they realize that then the end of Islam will happen, I do feel that this is a possibility, however this is where I and the EU Elites have a difference of opinion. They have allowed the extremists to operate within Europe with almost total immunity, Mosques have not been closed down, few imams have been deported, literature calling for the death and destruction of infidels flows unimpeded and some of the speeches are just disgusting. We have let the wolves control the sheep and some of those sheep turn into wolves or support the wolves.

Yes I am aware that Islam is the problem, my issue here is that I have met some Muslims like Deeyah who drink alcohol, eat whatever they want, dress as they want and yet still call themselves Muslims, they also freely express their opinion against the extremists, they say to me they are not Muslims. Those are the types of Muslims that I am happy to stay in Europe and eventually will carry out the transformation that Wafra Sultan is calling for, but note, Islam can not be reformed, only transformed.

Many of these people have looked into their own hearts, their own spirituality and they reject the warfare and the killing, but they tell everybody that Islam is not like the one that the Fundamentalists push, but sorry I have read the Qu'ran, I have read various ahadiths and they are wrong, the Islam they following is their own interpretation of Islam, they have closed their eyes to the bad parts of Islam and said, that was for the past, but the word of God is unchanging, they can not just pick parts of it. In fact by rejecting it they are no longer Muslims.

So if you have one of those conversations do as I do, say to them that they are not a Muslim, because in the Qu'ran it quite clearly tells Muslims to kill and convert people such as me, and add welcome to the human race.

This verse is the one that really makes the religion a justification for any act:

2:106 Nothing of our revelation (even a single verse) do we abrogate or cause be forgotten, but we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that Allah is Able to do all things?

The core beliefs of Islam are the issue, the pillar called Jihad, which is not a inner spiritual struggle, after all the Qu'ran says this:

2:216 Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that ye hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that ye love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, ye know not.

Then you think about these verses in regards to infidels:

8:39 And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah. But if they cease, then lo! Allah is Seer of what they do.

8:65 O Prophet! Exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred (steadfast) they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are a folk without intelligence.

8:67 It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise.

2:191 And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers

I can tell you that any resistance to Islam is taken as an aggressive act, in that as a European you are not seen as being innocent, only a devout Muslim can be innocent.

The difficulty for me is working out how to manage the above, the Churchill comment that the Muslims are either at your throat or at your feet was really so correct, but are we talking about trying to convert the people away from Islam then what Churchill said is containment or annihilation, so put the squeeze on long term humanely, but in doing this we are taking such a risk with peoples lives, it really is a huge gamble and I and many others are asked to pay the price for it.

I really do feel that we need to organize for the point in time when they make their move, we need to make it very expensive for each of our lives lost, we need to hold our own while the government flounders. But the loss of any of those non-Muslim Muslims I detailed above should be taken as a great tragedy and I suppose in this sense my views my have some linkage with the EU, but there are times when we must use the stick and this is something that the EU has failed to do.

At some point Islam will need to be defined as incompatible with Western style democracy, that is one of the sticks. Another is to expel those that do not accept our society and identify those that are the liars and manipulators such as Tariq Ramadan. From that point it will get nasty, but at least we will feel that something is being done to protect us against Islam and to safeguard the future of our children and our grand children, which is not how I feel now...

America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It

2006-12-20T17:59:00.000+01:00

This is Daniel Pipes observation of Mr. Steyn book, he says that it offers a devastating thesis but presents it in bits and pieces, so I shall pull it together here.

http://www.danielpipes.org/article/4121

He begins with the legacy of two totalitarianisms. Traumatized by the electoral appeal of fascism, post-World War II European states were constructed in a top-down manner "so as to insulate almost entirely the political class from populist pressures." As a result, the establishment has "come to regard the electorate as children."

Now that last part really does seem to fit with the whole EU attitude which is so apparent with this insulting reporting from the EUCM for the crime of using my brain and realizing that Islam is not compatible with the society that I want to see.

I am expecting my parents to deal with the bully that is threatening me, but because it is such a pain for them, they are telling me off for bothering them about it while trying to bribe the bully, time for one hissy, sassy fit I think. Time to be extremely childish...

The war is upon us whether we want it or not, time for action

2006-12-20T11:59:00.000+01:00

Like many people all I want is to live as I want to, eat what I want, drink what I want, cause no harm to others, have my property and person protected and the same for others. I have nothing more than a speeding ticket to my name.

But lets get this straight, Europe is in trouble, the events we saw in Bosnia will be happening across Europe, it may be tomorrow, it may be in 10 years, but within 20 years the Europe that I grew up in will be dead, in fact it is almost dead.

People need to stand up and say, I am not taking this any more!

That post below on Muslim alienation, does anyone in Europe have their eye on the alienation of their own population? Do they know what is coming.

My father said to me two years ago, that he hated our own leaders more than he hated the Islamics, I was shocked, but I am with him 100% now, our leaders are selling us the people out, they are leaving us to be robbed, raped and killed, if we re-act they punish us severely, but those that do these crimes get away with it with hardly any punishment.

Take this Mosque in Annecy, 5 French teenagers set fire to it, they got 5 to 7 years, the Muslim rioters got on average 5 months, what does this tell you. There is also the case of a Frenchman in Paris, now this guy is an extreme right winger, a racist, who set of some sort of firework in a coffee house frequented by Muslims, he is in jail for 18 years, get this right, 18 years... What does this tell you.

Below I mentioned that the Interpol data on International crime has been removed, and why is this, well it shows without any doubt that crime and violence has exploded in Europe. It was not the European utopia that the EU elites could allow their population to see.

Lets just sit back and look at this at a strategic level, almost every single country in the world now has a growing and vocal Muslim community. These communities are walling themselves off as separate colonies and spreading their influence within the political structure. How often do they vote as a block, note that incident in Holland where all the Turks were told to vote for a Turkish candidate by an email sent from the Turkish embassy. And in the UK did you know that the only recent example of voting fraud at an administrative level was carried out by Muslims.

Now if we go back to the misnamed war on terror, the Europeans know that they are on the edge of a cliff, they have a large and restive minority population that is just waiting to cause extreme levels of civil commotion. When this happens properly, economic activity will collapse, troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere will have to be withdrawn, fighting will erupt on the streets, the Mosques which are command posts and armories will be at the centre of the conflict and Europe will be looking inward, torn with indecision and violence as its unprepared population are ruthlessly massacred by a population that has readied itself for this. Have you seen how many Muslims are doing martial arts, to protect themselves, yes really.

Al Queda and Iran will then make their move, so called moderate Islamic nations will be taken, Europe will then be faced with a new invading Muslim horde and it will fall, because we will lost all cohesion and central control as our home areas are where the conflict is happening. You do not really have to be a military genius to work this scenario out do you. Can I point out something that is perhaps very interesting, France has withdrawn its 200 special forces from Afghanistan, well they could be going to Lebanon, or perhaps going to France.

And what about the USA, surely they will come and help us, no, we treat them with contempt and the population that would count do not want to do anything for those arrogant US despising Europeans.

Well what can we do, well the first thing is to try to create some sort of network to show where all these events that the EU is hiding, we need to get them in the open, we also need to organise around a cell based structure, first of all to keep safe against Islamic murder squads that will strat to operate with relative impunity soon, then perhaps to protect ourselves against our governments who seem to see their own people as enemy number 1. We must prepare for when the Muslims start their civil commotion, we must build cadres of leadership, to organise the people when all hell breaks out, we must try to get hold of things that will help us defend our families. The possibility of this being dealt with without violence is zero and anyone living near large Muslim population centres should now get ready for the coming storm.

And if you think like I used to that we have leadership in our countries that will do the right thing, then look at the report published by the http://eumc.europa.eu and ask yourself whether these are the people who can safeguard us against the threat of Islam, I think that you will see my point and you would join with me in the lament, why did it come to this....

Muslim alienation risk in Europe, what about non-Muslim alienation?

2006-12-19T13:15:00.000+01:00

"Muslims' sense of belonging could be eroded by European nations not tackling discrimination, a watchdog has warned."

When you read that you start thinking the problem is with us, isn't it? But it is not...

"A report by a European Union-backed anti-racism body says the number of Islamophobic incidents in the 25 member states is probably under-reported."

Well Islam is not a race it is a belief system, a belief system that rejects laws made by men for men. Then we have this crap word Islamophobic, which is meaningless because at the end of the day a phobia is an irrational fear, but there is nothing irrational with being concerned about Islam, just ask Christians in PA controlled territories and in Iraq, or Pakistan and Indonesia. Or now in Europe, there is no irrationality in being concerned with Islam, the irrational ones are the blinkered people who published this report. You just need to look at page 15 to 16 where they make a real lame attempt to define Islamophobia, what a load of rubbish, well I never judge a Muslim as being at the same level as feces. I happen to feel sorry for many of them. They come back to the definition in page 62.

Why has Interpol stopped showing crimes stats, well for a start crime in Europe has overtaken the USA, but this is not supposed to happen in the EU utopia that these people think is happening. The MSM carries out an orgy of news when anyone does something to an Islamic person or icon, but hides the numerous attacks by Islamics on infidels. Why? Any person finally reacting to the Islamic attacks is treated very harshly, more so than the Islamic killers, why?

The EU and European governments are betting our lives and security on a hunch that Muslims can be moderate, we the people who are fed up with being the pawns in this irrational experiment are treated with extreme measure is we say that this is madness or show our displeasure in any way. But in truth can anyone of a rational mind after reading the Quran and the ahadiths really think that this is possible, no...

"This can give rise to hopelessness and could undermine Muslims' sense of belonging in the EU."

I am sorry to tell you, but the majority of Muslims in Europe have no sense of belonging to Europe or one of its nation states, they are above all Muslims. How can you make that broad sweeping statement when half of their population is kept in the house or covered from head to toe for the crime of being women. Where the majority of Muslims live separate lives to the existing population.

And let me tell you of hopelessness, I see the take over of Europe by Islam, I feel hopeless that there is nothing that will stop it with our current leaders and policies, that is hopelessness and this will manifest itself in the flight of decent law abiding people in the near future, it has already started.

The position of Muslims in the EU has become an increasingly important political question in the five years since the 9/11 attacks on America. However, events ranging from terrorism to the international row over the Danish cartoons of the prophet Muhammad - has made integration a problematic issue for many governments.

What this really means is that the governments have been kicked out of their complacency and are at last being told in no uncertain terms by the people that the current state of affairs is not acceptable. The creeping takeover by Islam is something that we do not want.

"Muslims feel that acceptance by society is increasingly premised on 'assimilation' and the assumption that they should lose their Muslim identity," says the report. "Muslims feel that since 9/11 they have been put under a general suspicion of terrorism."

And about time, Islam is not compatible with modern secular open rights based democracy, if they want to stay then they can not feel that Sharia law is the way forward, that women are brood mares, that Jihad is the way and that I as an infidel is at the same level as a pig, dogs, urine, and feces. That a Muslim is the best of people, that non-Muslims have no rights, that there are no innocents because they are not Muslims. And that you can lie, cheat, manipulate your way with good people with impunity. No we are getting wise to you.

As for the EU, how can you dare to publish such a report that defines your own people as racists and bigots for being concerned with an ideology, words escape me, your extreme arrogance has no limits, your stupidity knows no bounds. When I read the Foreword of the report I felt personally insulted, you dare to tell me that to be concerned about Islam in your ridiculous term Islamophobic that this is the same as racist and xenophobic. There are so many self-centred and fake assumptions in this report.

"Muslims in General want to be seen as partners..."

Partner in what, partner in the development of Islam in Europe, partner is getting self-deluded fools like the writers of this report to do their work for them. Do the writers of this report even know their own history, the countless battles to turn back the Muslim tide of conquest.

The issue is not with the general population of Europe, the issue is that Muslims follow the tenants of Islam.

Beate Winkler you should be ashamed of yourself, but your not, your a self-righteous full of wishful thinking idiot, "if only we would be nice to them then they will accept us." Well the grave yards of history are full of people who felt that way.

The comment on the Cartoon controversy misses the whole point, they hold up Mohamed as the perfect man, a role model to be emulated, a man who robbed, killed, raped, took slaves and carved out a bloody Empire and this is their perfect man. And he is so perfect that nothing can be said against him. But hold on one moment, as Islam is a political system, a whole way of life, what choice my freedom when I can not challenge that ideology in total safety, what now for my so called nonnegotiable freedom of expression. If Islam was like Christianity, with no desire to take over the reigns of government, then I would hold off, but as Islam wants to dominate my life, take over and apply its own rules then I see a direct threat to that freedom of expression. That Mr Winkler can not even see that shows that he as a typical EU Elite does not understand democracy...

This assumption is peppered around the whole report, do you agree with this statement?

"Freedom of expression and the protection against racist and xenophobic language can, and have to, go hand-in-hand – the two together make democracy meaningful."

For me what makes democracy work is the ability to question everything without fear and protected by the law

Islamophobia is characterised with respect to:

1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
2. Islam is seen as separate and “other”. It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
3. Islam is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive, and sexist.
4. Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism, and engaged in a clash of civilizations.
5. Islam is seen as a political ideology, used for political or military advantage.
6. Criticisms made of 'the West' by Islam are rejected out of hand.
7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural and normal.

By the way I forgot to tell you that they want to make Islamophobia a crime, so think about item 5. in particular, we have the thought police in the EU at last...

There is a list of so called Islamophobic incidents, but have they even asked themselves about doing a reverse study, of Muslim attitudes to non-Muslims and attacks on non-Muslims, recent data indicates that these attacks are in fact happening in much greater numbers then attacks on Muslims, is that our fault and even more pertinent, who is behind the majority of the attacks on Jews? Table 9 on page 86 is interesting is it not? Then look at page 10, are the police only interested in crimes against Muslims. When a UK woman was assaulted outside a Mosque was that a faith hate crime, the policeman told her that it happens all the time, these crimes are never reported, but look at the crimes reported here, man draws level with women in car and abuses her for wearing a headscarf.

Then you look at the ways that we are helping the integration of Islam, well we are helping inteh building of more Mosques, well that is going to help isn't it....

So this is put forward as a policy, I am trying to see here what the EU would propose:

Implementing social integration and inclusion policies for migrants and minorities
• The EUMC calls upon Member States to implement support measures for migrants and minorities, including Muslims, in order to enhance their social situation, provide them with equal opportunities and prevent their marginalisation and exclusion from mainstream society.
• Member States should establish or support inter-departmental working groups tasked with ensuring that social and economic government policies deliver on the objective of promoting integration on the basis of equality and nondiscrimination for all cultural, ethnic and religious minorities.
• Migrants and minorities, including Muslims, should be actively consulted in the formulation of policies and measures aimed at social integration.
• Effective social inclusion strategies should work with a concept of empowerment. Effective empowerment implies that migrants and minorities, including Muslims, are provided with rights and resources that enable them to take responsibility for enhancing their social integration.
• The EUMC encourages Member States to make use of the Common Basic Principles on Integration (CBPs), adopted by the European Council in November 2004, in their integration policies, in order to improve and diversify their integration programmes and policies.

You can only shake your head at the above, the efforts to enable integration is only on our side

Involving the media
• The EUMC recognises that mainstream and minority media play a key role in shaping social attitudes and behaviour. Further research is needed on both their content and the impact they have on society concerning racism, xenophobia, Antisemitism and Islamophobia. The EUMC for its part will reinforce its work on the media notably through media monitoring initiatives and expert meetings with media professionals.
• The EUMC encourages media organisations and Internet service providers to ensure that complaints procedures are accessible to vulnerable groups, and implement training programmes for journalists and other media professionals to be more reflective of diversity and prevent racist or discriminatory content
in the media.
• The EUMC calls upon the Member States to enact or reinforce appropriate legislation on Internet service providers to prevent the dissemination of illegal racist, xenophobic, antisemitic and Islamophobic material, in accordance with article 14 of the EC Directive on Electronic Commerce (2000/31/EC).

So only a superficial skim, but this is so evidently proof of everything that is wrong with the EU and why it is highly likely that people like me will at some point find themselves in the uncomfortable position of either accepting Islam, chosing to fight and die or leave...

Humour

2006-11-20T15:59:00.000+01:00

In Brussels today where Interior Ministers of the member nations were meeting to discus the problematic exercising of freedom of expression by some of its citizens it was decided that all European citizens should immediately revert to Islam. The reasons cited was that continuing to be free, independent and secular Europeans was fueling anti-Western feeling in the Middle East and amongst Muslim minorities. In doing this the European Union will reduce tensions and prove to Muslims that Europeans are not anti-Islam.

In another move France fired 5 Nuclear missiles at Israel, killing the majority of the Jewish population. The French government said that this action was taken to remove the main road block to peace in the Middle East, they stated that the decision was taken after an Israeli fly flew over a French army unit helping Hezbollah setting up one of their missile batteries. Another Government spokesman said at last we have got rid of that shitty little country that caused us all those problems.

2006-09-12T13:58:00.000+02:00

"If you attack a whole community, it becomes despondent and then angry."

This is the phrase used by Mr Bari threatening the British people with more terrorism if we defend ourselves against the current level of terrorism.

I had not posted for a while as I had work to do and also due to the fact that this was taking over my life, I was getting despondent and angry because these Muslims were destroying the one world that I wanted to see and good people were letting them get away with it.

There is a time that a civilisation has to stand up and be ruthless in defending itself and for the West the time is now.

When you analyse in detail the approach of the Muslims, you can see a very clever long term plan, involving warfare to sap the strength and political and demographic strategies that weaken resolve to face this threat and to reach a critical mass of population to be able to call the shots. Thye use threats of disorder etc. to scare governments who are totally scared of civil commotion.

People keep asking why there are no Winston Churchills to stand up to the moment, well in the 30's Churchill was treated like an outcast for his views, but now he would have been declared a racist islamophobic and his political career would have been ended, this is a deliberate strategy and is pushed by people like Bari. We do not have Winston's on the horizon because no one can take the risk of being tarred a racist.

You also see on the Western side a plan that involves making people open their eyes and see that we are not their enemy, that is the EU position. It involves being passive, acting in an even handed way and calling to the reason of the people. It does not work for a number of reasons, the first is that the fear of hell has been drummed into Muslims from an early age, the second is the fear of death or at best social exclusion if they leave Islam. Then we have to work out and apply policies that weaken this hold, something that the EU has failed to even grasp, instead we let them get on with it, building their institutions and enclaves that bind their population in to this ideology and the only people we talk about changing is the open enlightened people who let it happan, not the bigots like Mr Bari. Like all immensely clever pople the Euro elites believe that they are right and that it just needs more time, well time is not on their side is it, the classic view of Islam is taking over Islam, it is not a mis-reading of Islam, where are the policies to stop that? No where on view, how many deported extremists have there been? So we do nothing.

I saw a report that 53% of Brits see Islam as a direct threat to freedom and democracy with 17% blind, deaf or blinkered people (or even Islamics) thinking that Islam is soft and cuddly, this shows that the people have at last worken up to the threat. Mr Bari is aware of this growing trend, he knows that the political pressure is growing on the Government to take heed of this as real anger is growing.

What is Mr Bari's game?

Do the Muslims have a game plan for when the infidels wake up?

Playing the innocent victim may work on the general population to mask the religion, but after a while we can not ignore our lying eyes and ears, even if the BBC, Reuters and AP all try to slant it differently. No this stage is past, he must be trying to scare the Government with a possible open Muslim rebellion that will scuper the EU's strategy completely, does the UK government want to be the one that broke the rotten egg?

It could well be that he is now using the victim mentallity to deal with those few Muslims who seem to question the teachings that infidels are out to get them, we need you now to fight for your community, we Muslims are victims, but Muslims are the biggest victims of Islam, especially the poor ignorant ones.

Are we into the next stage, is this when the war really starts, Bari is perhaps deliberately pushing the normal Brit over the edge, to start fulfilling that victimhood that they love so much and to weaken the perception of being even-handed.

My point of view is that it is much better that the Government start to act on such issues, however the governments in Europe have failed the people, we have let into our countries an alien ideology that can not be reasoned with and we will pay for this with our lives and the lives or our children. I never wanted to see people take the law into the own hands with a mass of people carrying out crimes such as what happaned in Bosnia. I wanted controlled government policies that would deal with the threat in a logical way to protect the people in Europe and not to pander to some inflated world vision of our own power that does not exist.

Recently I have been studying weapons purchases by North African and Middle Eastern countries, they are arming their military, they are increasing their numbers, they are using the oil (and gas) money to prepare. Have a good long look at the purchase of modern weapons by Algeria recently, perhaps it is that local conflict they had with Morocco at times, or what about the GFA, but these are weapons that are used in high intensity warfare. Saudi Arabia is buying the Eurofighter, but was it to decommision those old Tornadoes, ahhh, no, they are going to be upgraded.

The final attack on Israel will be within the next 5 years, there will be a devestating nuclear strike on the country followed by an invasion, they will kill any suvivors and they will stop the enfeebled West from doing anything about it, the EU is not bothered about a couple of million Jews, they were not bothered before and they are reverting to type, oh the shame of it. But then again there is always the Samsom option.

At this point I do not think that I have to decide whether I have to take action on a personal level, but that day is not far away if ther is continued inaction, the governments in Europe should heed this warning carefully. I will give you the Jack Straw example, if I was walking in London and saw Jack Straw I would physically attack him as a traitor to the UK, I would not not seek him out, but I would not be able to hold my self back from attempting to do him real harm if he incompetently stumbled into my view. When a quiet, studious law-abiding person who has no criminal record above one speeding fine says something like this, then you really ought to take note.

The killing of innocents, what is an innocent?

2006-06-26T09:23:00.000+02:00

Over the past year the general public is becoming more aware of Islam, and they are starting to feel uneasy, they have been told that Islam is a religion of peace, but their eyes and ears are telling a different story, unease is growing and people are starting to question the situation and make their views known.

The Muslims are now going into over-drive to try to deflect this growing concern, we start with a religious edict by Muslim Scholars in Birmingham, which says something like this:

“We, therefore, issue this religious edict and state for all concerned that killing of innocent civilians is absolutely forbidden in Islam and anyone who contemplates or commits any such act, does so against the teachings of Islam.”

Please note that they have not defined innocents in anyway and unless they do this statement is totally and utterly worthless and is deliberately meant to mislead those Westerners who read it. Most Western people will take innocents to mean people who are not involved in the fighting, women or children, civilians, but for Islam it really means those that are not causing corruption in the earth, and that means that only devout Muslims can be classed as innocent.

Now we have this Expo a year to the day that Classic followers of Islam carried out yet another of their atrocities against those who are spreading corruption on this earth (in other words not accepting Islam) its goal is the same as those Birmingham imams, it is to keep the British public off their guard. Please if you have any desire to keep those freedoms, reject these lies and learn what Islam really means.

Below I have detailed part of an essay by Archi Medes

Those who wage war against Allah/Mohammad and/or cause corruption in the earth will be killed, or crucified, or significantly dismembered (to the point of being permanently disabled), or banished (or imprisoned). (The severity of the penalty would depend on the judged severity of the transgression against Islam). In addition, they will be punished in hell (5:33). Allah punishes those who "make mischief in the earth," subjecting them to a "painful doom" (2:10; 2:11-14).

Corruption in the land, or corruption/mischief on earth, is a huge category of offenses, violent or non-violent, that significantly go against Islam. Google "corruption on earth" + "death penalty" to get an idea of the range of offenses considered to fit that category today in some strict Islamic countries. These crimes vary widely, including, for a few examples, criticizing or calling for changes in Islamic traditions; practicing "sorcery"; engaging in "charlatanism"; sex between a non-Muslim man and a Muslim woman; highway robbery; destruction of buildings; and terrorism against Muslims.

War against God, mentioned in 5:33 (below), is also the same kind of huge, flexible category that could include a wide variety of offenses significantly against Islamic doctrine or Islamic society. Aqa Mahdi Puya comments: "Waging war against Allah and His prophet means hostility against His chosen representatives; or deviation from His laws by overstepping the boundaries laid down by Him; or letting loose a reign of terror to persecute and frighten innocent people in order to deprive them of their rights; or attempts to undermine the cause of Islam and the overall interests of the Muslims; or activities to enslave, exploit and destroy human beings." Source: http://al-islam.org/quran/. There are a couple of potentially misleading statements in Puya's commentary. First, the Koran does call, in jihad, for terrorizing the disbelievers (8:60, 9:5), but never calls for terrorizing believers. Puya's comments about "innocent people" could refer to Muslims, but the Koran does not consider the non-Muslims to be innocent - far from it (see below). Second, the Koran permits Muslims to have slaves (4:3, 4:36, 23:6, 24:58, 30:28, 33:50). Otherwise, Puya's commentary is consistent with other accounts. According to Ibn Kathir, disbelief is included in the category of crimes labeled 'war against God;' see http://tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=5&tid=13751. What 'corruption on earth' and 'war against God' have in common is that each is a huge category encompassing a variety of violent and non-violent words and actions considered offenses in Islam. The significant overlap between the two categories involves opposition to Islam, including non-violent opposition.

Once you understand the above you will realise that this Expo and those Birmingham scholars are basically hiding the truth to further Islam. As far as a Muslim is concerned a disbeliever is the biggest criminal of all and not an innocent in any way shape or form.

To learn more click on this link: http://islamexpo.blogspot.com/

Planning to leave Europe by 2018

2006-04-27T14:17:00.000+02:00

Well my mind is made up, however at this point the USA is not the safest place to be, as it needs to be hit hard for the gloves to come off. It is the number one target for the Islamics. Once the USA is woken up fully to the danger, and it requires a truely nasty attack on a scale perhaps greater then 10 times 9/11 then it is the only destination for me and my family. Because once they start to fight they will win. I happan to think that the Islamics will nuke the USA at some point and when they do the USA will go all out.

I have to now work out the logistics, I will build up assets in the USA, I will invest in companies that serve the USA and not the global market and of course companies involved in the military side of things.

I have some USA contacts and I will try to get my kids to go to the USA, I intend to take a holiday there and get the kids interested. Even if I don't make it perhaps they will go there.

The EU will at some time wake up to the fact that many of its richest and brightest are fleeing, when it does they will try to block the free movement of capital as they have all those Muslims to pay off. My time scale is 2018 with all my assets intact, or earlier with less. I have a business that could give me a base income on which I will have a limited amount of capital drain. I already have some shares in the USA and I will cultivate some of the Americans I have got to know over the years to find the best place to re-locate.

So now I understand the problem with Islam, what do I do?

2006-04-05T08:16:00.000+02:00

A journey that started in 1997, just after a woman in a short sleeve T-Shirt was aggressed by a member of the ROP in London for daring to walk in front of his palace of hate. At that point I wanted to understand why? And I certainly do now...

Over the last three years it has really sunk in how dangerous the threat is purely from demographics. The real issue for me is have enough of the people who are designated as Muslims really ex-Muslims in the sense that they do not believe in Sharia and are not cultists around Mohammed. Have they joined the enlightened human race or not?

My timescale is fairly set, I am stuck in Europe until 2018 due to tax reasons, but at that point I am selling out and moving to the USA, because Europe has had it, I might however be too late even under that timescale, but living in the USA without any money is not an option..., the best thing I can do for the Eurosocialfascists is take my wealth somewhere else, they can tax the Muslims, what a joke that is?

I see signs that the European people are waking up and there is even a little movement in their governments, but it has gone to far, the Islamics have been too sucessful, for example at the recent march for freedom of expression a protester was charged with the offense of holding up one of those cartoons and possibly inciting a riot, or more like offending one of the ROP brigade who was there to pick out such people. Britain is a joke...

As for me I will badger away at it when I have the opportunity, but I will stop looking at sites dedicated to exposing this stupid horrible religion, why depress myself any further. At least one thing, my children who are top of their class will not be in Europe to be slain by the Islamofascists as I have firmly implanted in their young heads that Europe is dying and that the USA is the place to go, and to make it easier I will go with them too.

Condi Rice visit to Blackburn

2006-03-31T17:17:00.000+02:00

This was rather funny:

" The party will then move on to the Liverpool Institute if Performaing Arts, established by Sir Paul McCartney, where she will hear a gospel choir, before a concertat the Liverpool Philharmonic Hall.

The Singer Jennifer John said that she had chosen to perform John Lennon's pacifist anthem Imagine as a form of protest. She said the opportunity to stand opposite the most powerful black woman in history, whose politics I do not share, and sing Imagine is not something that I could refuse."

Well Jennifer John, would you also sing this song in front of Osama Bin Laden and what do you think the result would be?

Well anyway!

2006-03-31T14:28:00.000+02:00

Yesterday I decided that I was not going to look at anything to do with the Islamic problem, but in the end I could not help myself, at 15:30 I looked at Dhimmi Watch and found something that made me cold angry, the sort of anger where you feel real hate and it was about Jack Straw. Its a really odd feeling, hating a traitor like Straw more than the Islamofascists, but I have reached the point that my Father has. He was sprouting out the typical nonsense about Islamic being a religion of peace and I just thought, what a wanker.

Anyway, for a change I will write about something else:

Last Sunday my son had a bath, he took this very life-like toy alligator into the bath. As 9-year olds do he left it there, somehow it ended up outside the bathroom. One of my cats was walking past and noticed it, up went the fur on the back and then she groweled at it, then she walked towards it in one of those ready to fight/flee type walks that cats do, she tapped it three times and then turned her back on it and walked, quite amusing that.

Now we all know about the CPE in France at the moment, France is a mess, lots of thuggy semi-Muslims carrying out criminal acts and controlled by the left wing to a degree that would make Britain in the 70's blush.

Well this morning was funny, woke up to some dozy socialist telling me that a couple of million left-wingers demonstrating on the street was democracy and that continuing with the law was a provocation to them. Now excuse me if I am wrong but you put a government into power to make decisions based on a system of checks and balance, I suppose that mass demonstrations is a check, but this is not balanced. If about 26 million people had gone on the streets then I would have thought the Government would get the point, but 2 million out of 56 million, give me a break.

About this labour law, the whole system is broke, the best thing they could do is scrap the whole system they have now and go for the UK model. At this point no small business can afford to employ someone, that is why unemployment is so high, because when you are weak economically no one will take a risk on losing their entire company on turnover problems and high wages. But only a socialist can't see it, or can they, I happan to think the communists love this economic decline. All the brightest and best are leaving, most of the go-getting young are in London, all that is left in France are the wankers who pass sociology type degrees. Also the Jews are leaving, that is a truely bad sign, but thats alright we get the Muslims instead, I suppose you can say that the French deserve it, not...

Another little beauty that shows the French mind perfectly, I love France and most of the French, but also I hate some aspects of the country and its people, just as I hate some aspects of the UK and its people.

The French government is stretched for cash, so another little wheeze, they have decided that independent workers such as me, they will now calculate their tax on 125% of your profit, unless you join an association that justifies your tax return. So I am assumed to be a criminal tax evader and slapped with a 25% increase in tax, unless I spend some money to allow an association to check my tax return and thenI will be taxed on 100% of my profit. Do a bit of job creation here and who pays for it, well me, if I don't I get screwed.

France is the only country that has a tax on your assets, which is anything over €752,000, you pay 0.5% on your fortune, if you have over €1,152,000 then its higher and so on. Well with the increase in house prices more people are falling into it, and now it is my turn, so that is another €3,760 out of my pocket and into the governments and then into the pockets of the criminals in the cities. I have to work out the value of everything and then put that up. And guess what a bloody socialist twat came up with that in 1989, he was jealous of people who could afford those swanky appartments in the centre of Paris and he evantually committed suicide because he could not, but this was his revenge.

Couple of things that piss me off about France

1. Socialist familly member, telling me that socialism is best, then doing everything on the black, doh!!! Do what you preach, but oh no.

2. Continous demonstrations and strikes over the most amazing things.

3. The CGT leader, what a prize pratt

4. People thinking that the size of their demonstration is something democratic

5. De Villepin and Chirac, that little walkout over the use of English was so sad...

6. The smug superiority that thick French feel over those red-neck yanks, what a laugh, yawn... and the next time I hear from a socialist that the USA will break up before the EU I will punch them...

However what I love:

1. The trains work, when they are not on strike

2. The wine

3. The resturants and the food

4. My wife

5. They use the expression "le cult musulman", so very apt that

6. That normal people are really quite nice, if you can keep them off of the USA and employment law and socialism

7. Great countryside

And the future, well Daffersd is already working on his plan to leave France for the USA in about 10 years time, I hate to leave la France, but in 10 years time it will no longer be the France that I love, it will be wracked by these violent thugs and anybody with money will be fleeced by the government to pay to keep these thugs quiet, it is so sad. I can't even go back to dear old Blighty because its just as bad there, if not worse in my opinion, because in dear old Blighty twats like Straw are destroying our freedom of expression.

Well I did mention this subject, damn, can't get away from it...

Freedom of Expression March

2006-03-24T11:34:00.000+01:00

It seems that the Islamofacists of MAC have manipulated one of the organisers into a panic so that he suggested that people do not bring banners and T-shirts of cartoons. This has caused some of the people who are upset with Islam to decide not to go. This is a serious mistake, you should go because you are standing up for freedom of expression, the fact that this has happaned shows how far freedom of expression has been undermined. Grit your teeth and go, and if you need to take a cartoon take one with Mohammed and the donkey, as in my opinion only an Islamofacist would find that offensive.

Update:

The organiser has just posted this to explain why he made that suggestion:

"It becamse plain to me from talking with a couple of British Muslim Journalists over the past few days that even the most secular, cosmopolitan British Muslim seems incapable, at the moment, of accepting that a display of cartoons might bot be a racist attack on them."

He also says:

"The principle of freedom of expression is used by some as a trojan horse, as a proxy for racism and islamophobia. Not by me, not by us, and not by this campaign."

First of all if those Muslims Journalists were really secular and cosmopolitan then they would see that these cartoons are not a racist attack on them, perhaps they would understand that those cartoons were actually being published because of the censorship imposed on us by violent Muslims. They do not understand freedom of expression and neither do they understand racism. Typical....

The second comment shows what a complete and utter twat the organiser is, because it is Islam that is under-mining our freedom of expression, its the same sad old story. At this point if I was able to go, I would still go, however I would make sure that I had a cartoon and perhaps the one with the bomb in the turban.

It seems yet again that the Islamofacists have won, really makes one sick doesn't it.

At last some hope, but ahhh the UN sells its soul

2005-12-16T13:35:00.000+01:00

I read an article written by Paul Sperry in Frontpage that the Pentagon is waking up at last to the real nature of Islam and is studying intently the Quranic texts and hadiths. The first requirement to win any war is to understand ones enemy and in this the West has failed to do up until now. If this is the case then I see a glimmer of hope, though I am sure that the PC brigade will be on it quickly.

And we heard about some working class people in Austrlia finally re-acting to the Islamothugs terrorising the neighbourhood, though the Islamothugs seemd to have paid back the reaction with additional interest. But at least normal people are standing up for themselves, though of course they are racists and thugs and beer drinkers, anything but concerned citizens who are watching aghast as thankless immigrants destroy their way of life and the police fail to apply the rule of law, remind me of anywhere else?

Now for the bad news, I looked at the UDHR as our key line in the sand, however our Islamomaniacs are busy in this area too, in an astonishing move on 12th April 2005 the United Nations Commissiion on Human Rights moved from promoting respect for human rights to promoting respect for all religions and their value system. If this was not so damn serious it would be almost funny, this explains why the UNCHR is so upset with Denmark over those cartoons, sod the human rights of free speach, no, what they are telling me is that I have to live by the rules of a truely offensive religion and I can not say anything against it as it might offend them. What about their value system, a value system that does not respect my human right to unbelief, does taht count for anything, not anymore for the UN its seems.

A German historian has worked out that anybody under 40 in Europe is likely to wake up under an Islamic government unless they are prepared to emigrate to the USA. Its funny that as it agrees totally with my views, I have been telling my children that they should plan to go and live in the USA when they are older because Europe will be a hell hole by the time they get to my age, I am sure that the EU elites will make the Islamofacists see sense, by asking them politely to live in peace and building whatever they demand of us. Maybe we will replace the CAP with the CJP, and if you can't work that out you won't know what a Dhimmi is either...

Another day

2005-12-09T12:40:00.000+01:00

Well I am sitting here at lunch time, with the kettle boiling nicely, having eaten the left over spagbol from Wednesday night. During this week I have been treated to a huge amount of BBC propoganda over the religion of peace.

We have a number of Muslims talking about their faith and where they fit in the UK, an exchange between a Muslim living in France and a Muslim living in Britain. Then we have a question and answer session with a mosque and wonder of wonders a womans football tournement in Iran. See women can take part in Sport, Islam is not that bad, we are one big happy smiling familly, yes...

If like me you have come to the conclusion that the so called religion of peace is really a religion of war followed by a large herd of people trapped by fear and denial. Islam is not moderate but perhaps some of the people are.

Then you will also work out that the West is trying the, here is democracy, here is the rule of law, we respect you, treat you as equals and you will change and become nice citizens of Europe and the good old USA. Well in my lighter moments I could possibly see the faintest chance that this might work, however perhaps we need to understand that the most dangerous Muslim is a smiling clever one following the strategy as laid out in the Muslim Brotherhood's project. That they have an identity as Muslims that is above anything else, all this talk of David Beckham and that they want him to do well is all well and good, but if it is against their religion and the Umma then Beckham is dead meat.

So what does the future hold, well the religion of peace is setting itself up to take over, becoming more assertive, influencing, setting the scene, getting more involved, creating pressure groups, putting their propoganda into schools, creating their own faith based schools to stop any faint hope of integration, pushing Sharia law and its own system of government. Heck we are already there, under the guise of a religion we can not say anything against Islam as we are hurting their religious sensibilities, sod the fact that they want to apply Sharia law and change our system of government, I am Islamophobic, a racist, well my friends, all I want is the freedom to question and challenge those in power, its bad enough as it is now with the EU manderins who have no public accountability, but all you have to do is look at places like Pakistan, Lebenon and the areas controlled by the PA, Iran and parts of Indoneisa to realise where we are heading. I question why someone is doing x and that is anti-Islamic and I am dead. AND WE DON'T THINK IT WILL HAPPEN HERE do we?

A rich and poweful Saudi Arabian has brought a large stake in Fox news, already he is putting presure on the content, and who can forget the propoganda put out on our so called news channels of Palestinian kids being shot by Israelis, now found to be lies and never repudiated by the MSM. Thanks god for the Internet and now the UN is trying to control the Internet. Hold on a second, the UN is getting involved in the Danish cartoon incident, hold on, it was a racist crime to publish these cartoons, nothing about freedom of speach.

Back to the BBC, one way of hope, the hidden gagged majority with the new system have started to make their voices heard, but hold on, the PC brigade and the Islamoprotecters are on the case. At least some of those dissenting voices are being heard.

At this point I think I am at peace with myself, I was so angry, not so much at the Muslims, but at our own stupid leaders, I see signs, that they are waking up, one step forward, two back, two forward, one back, however they do not get it fast enough, being in my 40's I will perhaps be the last of the European generation to die in my bed of old age with luck, but that is not the fate of my children, their fate is that of Lebenon in the 1970's. And there is not anything I can do to stop it.

I have come to the conclusion now that there has to be moral trade-offs on protecting the many against the few, I know that this is wrong, I would prefer to have individual safeguards for everyone, but for the sake of my children we can not afford to.

We are war with Islam, but no one in the West in any position of authority or with any power accepts that fact, maybe they are as helpless as me, looking at the PC brigade I certainly think that anyone who shows a bit of fight is attacked until they are destroyed.

Well back to work on that happy note, to the infidels in the world, stay safe and enjoy your life, to the Muslims all I can say is sorry, sorry that you are on this planet, that you are bringing death and destruction and your warped thinking to the globe, that your are destroying freedom, democracy and all that is good in men, sorry!

The EU deals with I...(ooops can't say that) terrorism well perhaps not really...

2005-11-29T18:06:00.000+01:00

BARCELONA, Spain (AFP) - Europe agreed a pact on fighting terrorism with its mostly Muslim southern neighbours, but clear strains remained after a tense Euro-Mediterranean summit clouded by the absence of most Arab leaders. (Perhaps it was because some Israeli’s were there…)

Discord over the definition of terrorism marked the two-day gathering, which was portrayed by the European Union as a bid to revitalize a 10-year-old partnership with its Mediterranean-rim partners. (They export their terrorists and we give them loads of money…)

British Prime Minister Tony Blair, co-hosting the summit with his Spanish counterpart Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, hailed the accord on a Code of Conduct on fighting terrorism after extended wrangling over the wording.

"Terrorism can never be justified," Blair said addressing a news conference to close the summit. "This is a very important moment both for the European countries and for our other colleagues round the table." (Actually Mr Blair sorry to say it but you don’t know what the hell you are talking about, there are many verses in the Koran that justify it…)

For the EU states, terrorism can never be justified even as a means of winning self-determination, but the Arab states wanted the right to resist occupation.

"We will condemn terrorism in all its manifestations without qualification (and) reject any attempts to associate terrorism with any nature, culture or religion"

So what do I think:

Well in EU speak No means Yes, so what hope has that bloated bunch of elitist cretins got of working out the real issue of this age when they can't work out the difference between yes and no?

So the EU is now the entity controlling Italy and Spain, so Spain is occupying Muslim lands and Italy too, so using the weasel words of our so called colleagues, they have the right to resist that occupation against the EU. So with the EU allowing that slimily bit of double speak is giving the terrorists justification for attacking the EU over our occupation of parts of Spain and Italy... smart move guys!!! Add that to the long list of suicidal decisions.

I suppose we can start resisting the Arab imperialistic occupation of Europe using that definition, wonderful, I never wanted to be a terrorist; I can be a freedom fighter for the down-trodden ignored indigenous European masses instead. Problem is my ugly mug would never sell T-shirts.

You could not write better comedy on this sort of farce could you, perhaps this is what they were saying:

“We will condemn terrorism in all its manifestations without qualification and it really has nothing whatsoever to do with that religion of peace that is undermining our freedom of speech, causing death and mayhem across the globe where ever they rub up against non-believers, it has nothing to do with this great religion, those Quran verses are misunderstood and are all abrogated by the verse there is no compulsion in religion (blimely they understand abrogation) so those nasty verses of this peace living religion have no relevance what so ever, no one applies them, no school girls have their heads chopped off for walking to a Christian school, this is all your imagination, the press is biased, Israel is killing millions of Palestinians every hour, those 80 million Hindu's committed suicide by throwing themselves on Islamic swords, the pilots of those jets on 9/11 wanted to get a closer look at those buildings...”

I don't really believe it, almost had me there!

Shall we have a few of those verses for good measure (thanks Duke Eudes):

"We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve..."-- posted by God in Koran 3:151

"Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with terror.’"-- posted by Mohammed in Bukhari:V4B52N220

"I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle."-- posted by God in Koran 8:12

"If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned."-- posted by God in Koran 8:57

"Little do you remember My warning. How many towns have We destroyed as a raid by night? Our punishment took them suddenly while they slept for their afternoon rest. Our terror came to them; Our punishment overtook them."-- posted by God in Koran 7:3

Is there any hope with such cretins in power?

Jihad Watch: Left or Right

2005-11-29T08:49:00.000+01:00

I would refer you to this discussion.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/009205.php

Mentat picked up on the same thing as I did a couple of months back, the UDHR, to me it was perhaps the cornerstone of what we in the West stand for, something that the Right and the Left could agree on  as being worth fighting for, basically rights for the individual.    The Muslim UDHR was a direct threat to the UDHR and yet no one had the guts or will to stand up for the UDHR.

I suggest that the UDHR should be the line in the sand, that which defines what Western civilisation really means.

The issue here is that more people on the right see the threat then those on the left, the left seem to be stuck in a “be nice to them and they will see” sort of approach, while the right is more inclined to fight and apply tough love.    I guess that is the difference, both get frustrated with each other.    I can see merit in both sides, but I do feel now that Islam has to be taken on head on and being nice just does not work.

The demographic time-bomb is the most striking issue, people on the right see it and want to take pre-emptive action, those in the left see such action as akin to that of Nazi Germany, as a result we have lost before we have started.

I think that making people see that Islam is a direct threat to the UDHR is the key to this conflict.    I have had a certain success even with people I know on the left, who now agree with me that Islam is a huge problem even as they slag of the USA.   But it is tough, people think that you are an extremist when you start explaining about the threat, during the French riots I was told to put more water in my wine...

Muslim immigration has to be stopped and reversed.  People who follow this cult must be made aware in no uncertain terms that this cult is not something that we in the West find acceptable in its current form.   We need to be prepared to use over-whelming military force as required, if some one attacks us then they have to realize that it was a huge error on their part.

I see beating Islam as the most important challenge that freedom loving folk have, but I don't think that at this point any of us are up for it, does it require our major cities to be radioactive smoking ruins before we wake up to the threat, I now believe that this is the only thing that will make us act.

History in a world that does not bother to learn the real history

2005-10-28T09:28:00.000+02:00

What amazes me is the lack of knowledge of people posting on the BBC “Have your Say” site in relation to the Israeli / Muslim conflict and in response to the President of Iran’s comment on wiping Israel off of the face of the map.

Israel was conquered by the Romans and the people expelled from their lands after a rebellion. But the Jewish people never left Israel, staying there when the Byzantines were in control and later when Islam conquered the area, though with Islam they were treated as second class citizens (dhimmi's.) At the end of the second world war Palestine did not exist as a separate nation, being under the control of Eygpt and Jordan. Your understanding is based on propoganda and postulating and is totally racist.The Israeli's were purchasing land from the Arabs at the start. Then the surrounding Arab nations attacked the Jews because they can not accept any land that has become Muslim land through conquest reverting back to its previous owners, the despised second class dhimmis.Then you should educate yourself about the anti-semite attitude that is rife across the Arab world, there is one programme that shows Jews cutting the throat of a young boy for their passover meal. If the Israeli's had acted with the same aggression as the Muslims, there would not be any Muslims left in that area.If you ask the majority of Muslims about Israel they will express the same sentiments as the President of Iran.I have to answer the question, Israel is such a tiny country, its a small parcel of land in a huge Muslim land, why the conflict, it's because the master religion can not accept a dhimmi people being masters of their own destiny and not slaves to the Muslims, that is the reason for the whole conflict. After Israel Europe will be next, don't forget that Spain was retaken from the Muslims as was Sicily.

Turkey acession talks now agreed

2005-10-03T17:04:00.000+02:00

Regretfully Austria has now backed down and the EU has now agreed to invite Turkey to join the EU. This is a momentous occaision indeed, how can they ignored the will of the people on this scale, Austria has 10% in support, France and Germany 30%, so what about the people who say no to a country that follows Islamic values, values that are completely alien to Western values, are we always to be ignored?

This is one of those "let them eat cake" moments, perhaps this is the begining of the end for the EU.

A Strategy to save Europe - Stage 1

2005-09-27T17:59:00.000+02:00

So difficult to know where to start, really we are in such a mess, until we can get the mainstream left with the mainstream right we will fail.

Grand Strategy a concept to bring all of the infidels together.

1) I think that the UDHR is the key to this, basically I think that it is the one ideal that we can all agree on and one which the Islamic world has universally said no to in both words and deeds, even going as far to come out with their own Islamic definition which is not challanged by anyone and it should be.

I have a copy of both and I can only say that the Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights is a masterpiece of double meanings and sleight of hand, even using an abrogated verse "There is no compulsion in religion" within it. Look closely at the Preamble as realise that this sets a scene for what is written later and also that the law is Shariah law which is straight away contrary to the 1948 UDHR.

I strongly believe that the UDHR should be our line in the sand

Eurabia the Euro-Arab Axis part 2

2005-09-23T08:22:00.000+02:00

As I wade through this book snatching time to read it where I can the overwhelming sense I derive from it is despair, how can the people entrusted with the protection of the European people have failed us so badly.

First of all I would like to point out that even though it is written by a Jew and is supportive of Israel I understand that and accept that, therefore I understand the slant towards Israel (and agree with the author.) But even taking into consideration that aspect it is evident that the EU and European nations have allowed the Muslim world to dictate European foriegn policy and develop cultural links under the threat of a cessation of oil supplies. The organised immigration into Europe and the allowance of their culture is part of this deal.

I look at this in amzaement that our leaders could have been so foolish to think that reason and rule of law will win against fear and religious introctrination. But what is inexcusable is that having the oil weapon used against us in the 70's should have caused a huge investment in alternative energy, but our leaders bowed to Arab demands and what is even worse did not take steps to remove us from the position we were in. That is incompetetence of the first order, I would however point out that the technology is only just coming to a point where it will enable us to break this strangle-hold on our economies, but it could have been pushed sooner.

I do take comfort in the fact that the Chinese have burst upon the scene, their demand of course not foreseen by the Muslims has pushed the oil price to a level where other energy sources with the new technology will become viable, now is the time for our leaders to take that opportunity and then tell this barbarians where to stick their Islamic culture..., but is there anyone with that ability in power, seriously I doubt it as the Islamic's have infiltrated our system so thouroughly that there is no one untainted by Islamic control.

The only people who can do anything is the ordinary man in the street, we have to stand up to the arrogant and infiltrated political classes, we have to say enough is enough, Islamic culture is completely alien to our judeo-christian culture, it has nothing to do whatsoever with the Jewish or Christian faith, or secular respect for human rights.

I am thankful for the Internet, this medium is enabling ordinary people to get beyond the Arab controlled main-stream media and give us a voice and we can now at last have our voice heard, what is evident is that many many people think the same way.

There is much anger in me, not at the Muslims, what do you expect from such people, they are acting true to their religion and history, they can be dealt with if we stand up, they have people who fight without fear, but warfare is different, we will win everytime.

My anger is directed straight at those in power and those undemocratic people running the shop in the closed meetings rooms of the EU, where people who have never had to face the people make decisions that bind us to an Islamic future. These people are sapping our strength and allowing to be taken over bit by bit, this is where we are losing, where they Islamics have won, there is no hope for Europe, because the people who don't accept this are ignored or treated in such a way that their voices are tarred with extremism. We are under the control of the weak and mallable, those that are naive and think they know best.

Let me make this clear, these leaders and faceless Euro people are directly responsible for the destruction of Europe, and before the end they will regret what they have done, as for the normal man in the street, we will be dead, our women and children slaves to Islam, our property taken over by those that steal and hate.

People will ignore this, this can not happen, well my friends look at Lebanon, look at the history of that country, where the Christian's are being pushed out or killed, this is happening everywhere in the Middle-East and because of the fifth column in our midst it will happen here too, its already starting.

Eurabia the Euro-Arab Axis

2005-09-21T14:29:00.000+02:00

I ordered this book and it arrived today, I had a quick skim, and to tell you the truth I am hesitating reading it, I have one of those head in the sand moments when you are thinking, well what I don't know does not hurt me. Over the last year I have begun to realise that the main problem is with our leaders, through whatever reason, we are being sold to the Islamics as slaves sometime in the future. On Monday I spoke to my father by phone, we have talked about the Muslim problem many times, but he told me this time that at last I have reached his point of view, he is 72 by the way. He hates our leaders even more than the Islamofacists for letting us get into this mess.

Reading this book is likely to give me a heart attack, or make me so angry and possibly despair, do you know what anger and despair does to a person, it makes you incredibly dangerous.

But at least I will understand why we are in such a huge mess.

I sent an email to the Human Rights commissioner of the Council of Europe, asking a direct question on Sharia law and the future of the use of such law in Europe. I was totally ignored, not even an acknowledgement.

Well my wonderful elites, that sit there in your ivory towers, ignoring the little people, do not make the mistake of ignoring us much longer, this anger and frustration is real, I am at boiling point and it just takes one more act for the gloves to come off.

I say this as a non-violent person who has only speeding fines to my name (well my brother did give my name when he was done for drunk and disorderly.) Who vehmently believes in the rule of law and that the police are the ones who should maintain law and order.

But I am seriously begining to feel that it is not enough because of the miss-management atthe top of our society, if someone like me thinks that way, what about the more extreme elements in our society, HELP....., CAN ANY OF YOU ELITES HEAR ME, PLEASE CAN YOU START LISTENING, ......, nothing, hold on, I hear something.

"We know best, what does the public know, they all read the SUN..."

Arrogance, stupidity and contempt, the EU, and our national governments, we are sheep led to the slaughter, we keep looking for someone to stand up, but the Islamofacists are deep within our societies now, stifling free speach and muzzling any that disagree with the dark direction in which we are heading.

What I feel properly written

2005-09-21T14:22:00.000+02:00

The following is an article written by a Spanish journalist, Sebastian Villar Rodriguez.

Europe died in Auschwitz, I was walking along Raval (Barcelona) when all of a sudden I understood that Europe died with Auschwitz. We assassinated 6 million Jews in order to end up bringing in 20 million Muslims!

We burnt in Auschwitz the culture, intelligence and power to create. We burnt the people of the world, the one who is proclaimed the chosen people of God.
Because it is the people who gave to humanity the symbolic figures who were capable of changing history (Christ, Marx, Einstein, Freud...) and who is the origin of progress and wellbeing.

We must admit that Europe, by relaxing its borders and giving in under the pretext of tolerance to the values of a fallacious cultural relativism, opened it's doors to 20 million Muslims, often illiterates and fanatics that we could meet, at best, in places such as Raval, the poorest of the nations and of the ghettos, and
who are preparing the worst, such as the 9/11 and the Madrid bombing and who are lodged in apartment blocs provided by the social welfare.

We also have exchanged culture with fanaticism, the capacity to create with the will to destroy, the wisdom with the superstition. We have exchanged the transcendental instinct of the Jews, who even under the worst possible conditions have always looked for a better peaceful world, for the suicide bomber. We have exchanged the pride of life for the fanatic obsession of death. Our death and that of our children.

What a grave mistake that we made!!!

If I can point to something written by another that says exactly what I feel then this is it…

Mohammad Sidique Khan RIH

2005-09-05T13:31:00.000+02:00

A translation of his recent video:

"Our words are dead until we give them life with our blood." In other words we don't see any point in talking over our differences, we will just kill people.

"Therefore we are going to talk to you in a language that you understand." More like we will talk to you in a language that we (the Muslims) understand, as its the only thing we understand...

"We are at war and I am a soldier" Well go and fight some soldiers then you imbecile...

"Your democractically elected governments continuously perpetuate atrocities against my people and your support for them makes you directly responsible, just as I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters." So there are no innocents that are non-Muslims, but who should he protect his fellows Muslims against, as far as I can read it more Muslims have been killed by fellow Muslims then by non-Muslims, but at least you managed to kill some Muslims in your blast, but hold on a second, weren't you supposed to be protecting your fellow Muslims...

"Until we feel security" Until wesurrender and become Muslims or allow the Muslims to do what they want "you will be our target" no change in this comment based on history.

"Until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people, we will not stop this fight." Bombing, targetted killing of terrorists, so they are your people, OK, gassing, we don't use gas, its banned. Imprisonment, hmmmm well not in Mosel, look at Michael Yon's excellent blog where many terrorists are let out to kill more Americans. Torture, well some atroctities were carried out, but compared to Muslim torture its insignificant.

So what does this message tell us, well nothing really, just the message of a dimwit who is sick and depraved, who follows an ideology of war.

PS RIH (Rest in Hell)

Creating Islamic phantoms aaaaagggggh

2005-08-30T16:13:00.000+02:00

I read a article by Adam Curtis in the Guardian Unlimited titled "Creating Islamic phantoms" that makes me just so angry, this is the guy who produced some propoganda for the BBC called the Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear.

He says the Modern Islamism is a complex political movement with a history that goes back more than 50 years. But it goes right back to the start of the religion itself in that there is no distinction between the religion and politics.

For me the smiling moderate is just as dangerous, if not more so than a foaming at the mouth, cave loving Bin Laden. They want the same thing as Bin Laden, a system of Islamic government across the globe. Mr Curtis should realise that the very reason that the Islamic movment failed in achieving its revolutionary aims is that the Governments in Islamic countries stopped them, by either killing or imprisoning the hardliners and by not going through a sort of sham democracy where all the devout Muslims vote for Islamic parties. See Iraq for a good example of this in action...

Islam is a frightening, violent, anti-western movement, led by preachers of hate, and that is all there is to it, once you have read the Quran and assorted hadiths its there in black and white.

I am pretty sure that there was a concerted push for Muslims to emmigrate across the globe, funded by Suadi Arabian oil money, a huge amount of oil wealth has been put into building the support system behind these population movements. Before you go any further do a simple test, please try to find a country on this planet that does not have a Moslem minority or some sorts. Then look at where the funding of mosques are coming from, not convinced, well there is always a bucket of sand to go and stick your head in.

I don't want to react to terrorism, terrorism is a vert effective tool of this religion and has been since it burst upon the scene. Terrorism exists from the fear of hellfire placed in the brains of Muslim children at an early age, and death to those who leave it or have deemed to have left it, to the attacks on commuters and office workers in high rise buildings.

I want to be pro-active against the threat of Islam which is inherently to destroy western liberal democracies and supplant them with a theocratic state of submission to the will of god as laid down by a Mulluhs interpretation of what the perfect man would have done.

Mr Curtis is wrong, those marginalised young men exist because Islam has made them marginalised by giving them values that can not co-exist with the values of liberty loving western societies. These people have rejected our socities even though we offered them respect for their culture which they obviously are told not to have for ours, reacting against Islam will make not one iota of difference to these peoples existence and hate towards us.

Mr Curtis, please read up on the Islamic campaigns in India, 80 million people have been killed by Islamic terrorists and it is still going on. And finally think very carefully about the fate befalling any apostle even in Britain who are threatened with death, then tell me agains that we should not deal with this evil ideology.

Al BBC

2005-08-26T09:25:00.000+02:00

As a Brit I am just programmed to check the BBC, I used to watch the news as a Kid and find the website a huge and useful resource, however I am finding myself more and more disillusioned with the BBC.

First off the total bias against Israel, it is so sickening at times that I feel embarrased as a Brit, the so called impartial news producer, the envy of the world being anything but impartial.

As for their comments, you post a reply as a white middle class Brit and you can bet your life on that fact that it will never get posted, but post with some third world name and you have at least a fighting chance. I have to ask who pays the license fee? The world viewers or British people... The BBC have certainly made it very clear to me that I am a second class citizen in my own country and that the views of say a Muslim fundementalist is much more valued than my views. The recent Panorama report on the MBC is a very good example, I happened to know that a very large number of people posted to say what an excellent programme it was etc., but none got posted, only those knocking it.

I go back to the most fundemental reason for the bias against Israel and the West, and in fact it can only be described as reverse racism. They expect a better standard of approach from first world countries, so report much more harshly on first world countries then on 2nd or 3rd world countries, who you do not expect to have the same level of commitment as us, to human rights, but I think everyone should be judged on the same basis, why should we accept this biased reporting any more. THat the leader of a third world country killed many of his people in unpleasant ways hardly gets a look in, but we cause the deaths of a number of people unintentionally and it is a huge crime, it just does not wash.

Israel for example targets militants, the objective is to kill the militant and fellow militants, they do not target the surrounding population, while the Islamic terrorists target non-combatents going about their day to day business, but who gets the implied criticism all the time, Israel of course.

Al BBC you disgust me.

The new Nazi's

2005-08-26T08:29:00.000+02:00

There are many aspects of Islam that reminds me of the Nazi's, but I think pictures speak louder than words and I will leave you to ponder this smashing image plucked from the Al BBC website.

Look at them, poor brainwashed bots whose only thought is to strap on an explosive vest and blow up Israeli schoolchildren on a bus or perhaps a line of teenagers waiting to get into a disco, or some old people eating a passover meal.

The West, what are we ashamed of?

2005-08-25T21:29:00.000+02:00

Something that also makes me wonder is what did we in the West do to have this over-riding guilt complex that makes us donate billions of dollar's or euro's or pounds to Islamic countries that despise us because we have not surrendered to Islam.

The USA, let me guess, its because you dare to be richer and more successful than the followers of Allah.

Great Britain, the Balfour declaration perhaps, or maybe that brief period of time where we blocked the progress of Islam.

France for daring to create a colony in North Africa.

OK, I know that at times we caused a certain amount of misery, death and destruction, but if I compare that to what Islam has done it is a drop in an ocean of malice.

Did we kill 80,000,000 Hindu's, idolators, nope, so why are we apologising and respectful to a so called religion that did that and much more, well beats me?